Published On: Wed, Dec 17th, 2014

Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member

BUK 312 - In Ukraine government terrotiry

BUK 312 – In Ukraine government territory (Anatoly Sharij)

The shoot down of Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 came into greater focus with the December 15 YouTube video featuring a former crew member of BUK self-propelled fire installation, number 312 (BUK 312). Ukraine’s government and others maintained that the BUK 312 unit shot down MH17 while manned by a resistance crew.   The Obama administration championed that narrative holding both the resistance and Russia responsible for the 298 deaths on July 17. The interview was conducted by investigative journalist Anatoly Sharij and translated by Marina Stewart (see full test in English at end of this article).   (Image: BUK 312 in Kiev junta terrotiry – Anatoly Sharij)

The 23-year-old former BUK 312 crewmember revealed that the missile unit was in fact manned by the Ukraine military. He outlines the missile system’s location and how it operated.   The former sergeant also offered analysis and research indicating the very low probability that the 312 crew shot down MH17.

Claims that the eastern Ukraine resistance shot down MH 17 with a BUK system rely on a Ukraine government audiotape in which resistance commanders allegedly admit to the shoot down. The tape lost credibility when it was discovered that a key part of the recording was made hours before the crash. In addition, the tape was patched together, not a continuous conversation.

The Ukraine secret service (SBU) claimed to produce photographs of a Russian BUK 312 missile system fully capable of knocking MH17 out of the skies. When that evidence failed to pass muster, an “open source” investigation by Eliot Higgins (also known as Brown Moses) allegedly produced evidence that the BUK 312 system was in the town of Snizhne in the Donetsk region controlled by the resistance.

If the BUK 312 was in Snizhne, as claimed, with a capable resistance crew, both doubtful assumptions, we would need to believe that the crew did nothing to protect Snizhne on July 15 (just two days before the MH17 shoot down) when Ukraine’s air force leveled major sections of the city (BBC, July 15).

The real story of who, how, and why MH 17 was destroyed is emerging over time. The interview adds evidence that deserves serious consideration. The former soldier, known as “A,” described his role in the Ukraine military and how the BUK 312 unit was staffed:

“I am 23, and I have been in contract service with the Ukrainian army. Last summer the contract term came to an end, but I was not dismissed from service for reasons well known to you. My duty station was the exact BUK self-propelled fire installation (Russian abbreviation transliterated as SOU – translator) number 312…”

A says that BUK 312 unit had a four member crew. He was the “deputy commander.” The unit started out in “Lugansk and [was] relocated to Kramatorsk. Donetsk.”   The former deputy commander explains the origin of the 312 label:

This is how you decipher 312:

3 stands for the third (Lugansk) division,
1 stands for the battery number, ours was no. 1,
2 stands for one of the 2. service units in each battery, ours was no. 2.

Interviewer Sharij asks: “This BUK 312 was said to be a Russian missile launcher.”

A responds: “No. This BUK is 100% Ukrainian one. … It made us all laugh, the way SBU presented this as BUK of the rebels or Russian BUK.”

AS: What do you think about this BUK downing the Malaysian Boeing?

A: No clue. By the time it happened I was transferred to Avdeevka division. I only heard SBU [Ukraine secret police] say this particular missile launcher with board number 312 downed the Boeing. All I know it couldn’t have done this. I spoke with my ex-comrades in arms and they said they didn’t do it.

In the days after the shoot down, Robert Parry reported government sources saying that their evidence indicated that a Ukrainian missile crew shot down MH 17. Reporting by Eric Zeusse and this author followed up indicating credibility to the claim that a Ukraine fighter jet shot down the civilian airliner.

The speculation over the BUK 312 system may have just been a smokescreen to divert attention away from the real culprit, whomever that may be.   A review of the full interview shows the value of direct testimony by involved parties.

Creative Commons

FULL TRANSCRIPT – Anatoly Sharij interview with former BUK 312 crew member Posted Ded 17, 2014, YouTube Translation Marina Stewart

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri_D2Iz7EVw

Anatoly Sharij: You may still remember the BUK which photo was published by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) as a Russian one. You may also remember me dwelling on it. I received a lot of feedback saying I was lying etc. Here’s an interview with Ukrainian contract sergeant crossing “t’s” and dotting “i’s”.

Anatoly Sharij (AS): Good afternoon.

A: Good afternoon. Good to be talking to you. I have been watching your videos for quite some time now, and I have to say you do uncover the truth.

I am 23, and I have been in contract service with the Ukrainian army. Last summer the contract term came to an end, but I was not dismissed from service for reasons well known to you. My duty station was the exact BUK self-propelled fire installation (Russian abbreviation transliterated as SOU – translator) number 312 you made your video about, I happened to recently come across it on the Internet.

The SOU has 4 crewmembers: service commander, me as deputy commander, driver and operator. This SOU 312 you made your video about was dislocated in Lugansk and your video shows it being relocated to Kramatorsk. Donetsk has a surface-to-air missile regiment having these BUK M1 on the inventory. The regiment consists of three divisions:

(1) in Avdeevka
(2) in Mariupol
(3) in Lugansk

This is how you decipher 312:

3 stands for the third (Lugansk) division,
1 stands for the battery number, ours was no. 1,
2 stands for one of the 2. service units in each battery, ours was no. 2.

BUK is a complex of 4 specialized military vehicles: command post, mobile target detection and assignment station, loading and starting station, self-propelled fire installation.

At the time the Boeing was downed I was out of army already, so I can’t say anything about it, but when it all began in the Crimea, this capture of military units, we’ve been ordered to leave our permanent disposition in Lugansk.

AS: This BUK 312 was said to be a Russian missile launcher.

A: No. This BUK is 100% Ukrainian one. The photo I sent you, the one with Yubileynaya mines on the background, has been made in Lugansk. (3’49”)

Our military unit was dislocated in Metallist settlement, on the upland near Lugansk, and this is the view from there. It made us all laugh, the way SBU presented this as BUK of the rebels or Russian BUK.

AS: What do you think about this BUK downing the Malaysian Boeing?

A: No clue. By the time it happened I was transferred to Avdeevka division. I only heard SBU [Ukraine secret police] say this particular missile launcher with board number 312 downed the Boeing. All I know it couldn’t have done this. I spoke with my ex-comrades in arms and they said they didn’t do it.

The first relocation of our Lugansk division was to Kramatorsk military airdrome. We’ve been allocated barracks there. In a month we’ ve been moved into the fields in Dnepropetrovskaya Oblast, Novaya Grigorievka village.

The photo you showed in one of your videos, the bad quality one (5’50”) was taken when our SOU commander decided to drive it, but the electric wiring inside the SOU ignited. The missiles nearly exploded, but luckily firefighters came on time to put the fire down. That’s why it was moved on the low-base semi-trailer as seen in the picture.

Let me tell you some about the Ukrainian army. While in the fields, the officers were boozing heavily, while soldiers and sergeants were not allowed to go to the nearby shop. I was actually planning to quit after my first contract term, but they wouldn’t let me. Being a straight shooter, I was outraged at this, so they started to pressure me, pitted other soldiers against me. The situation in general was very depressing, people kept deserting, many went over to the rebels, I, too, went to the hospital in Kharkov and just didn’t come back. The border is close there.

AS: What do you think was the purpose of using BUK at all in the combat area?

A: I don’t know. Initially this withdrawal may have been done to avoid BUK capture. Then, I suppose, this may have been due to shortage of manpower on the front…

AS: Strange….

A: But this is

A: But this is my guess only, for even officers didn’t know it, so it seemed, may be only commanding officer and chief of staff knew the reason. I am still unaware why would they want to do this, for BUK air missile launchers are deployed against airborne targets, the rebels have no aviation, so we are useless for ATO [“anti terrorist operation[ purposes. They did move some people from our division to ATO, a major general came to talk to those who were unwilling to take part in this campaign, I said I don’t want to go as I see no sense in it, besides, I already served my term, so I was transferred 80 kilometres away, to Vasilkovka village, to where 1st Avdeevka BUK division was.

When we left Lugansk, only three unusable complexes remained there, and those which did leave Lugansk, also broke down right after leaving the city, some were repaired en route, others were transported on low-base semi-trailers. Those which were left in Lugansk, lacked whole equipment units.

AS: but one must be able to use these…

A: So far as I could gather they do have professionals there. My friends in Lugansk when passing the military unit saw through the fence rebels trying to repair the complexes.

AS: What’s your opinion as a professional, who may have downed the Boeing?

A: Judging by firing zone, Ukrainian army did it.

AS: And the purpose?

A: No idea. I only know the kind of professionals they are, it could have happened unintentionally.

AS: What do you mean, unintentionally? They should have been given coordinates, the height, the speed of the target etc., it isn’t just a matter of pressing a button, is it?

A: Exactly. There’s a friend or foe comms exchange between the complex units, so you are right, it couldn’t have happened accidentally.

AS: Why firing at all then? They couldn’t have thought it was the rebels jet fighter, right?

A: I agree.

In general Ukrainian army lacks qualified manpower badly, many people just left the army, my friends are in Moscow, Novosibirsk, Rostov, elsewhere…

(Laughing)

One can’t get dismissed from service no matter what he does. If you abstain from entry on duty or, say, curse everyone, you won’t be dismissed. Many people just desert the army.

AS: And how are they accounted for? As missing?

A: It’s a mystery to me. But we had 15 sergeants and now only three are left, all of them are in ATO zone. They used to send some people to ATO from all our divisions before, now one of the divisions in full is there. I can’t make out why would they want BUK divisions there, rebels still don’t have jet fighters. It must really be shortage of soldiers, you have a video on rioting conscripts having exceeded their term of service by 8 months.

AS: Yeah, they have all been labeled Kremlin spies when they raised this issue with their commanders. A real Ukrainian should be willing to serve in the army for 2, 3, 5 years…

A: …for 154 hrivnyas a month…

I am not scared of anything and I have nothing to conceal.

Wish you new uncovering videos!

END of transcript

About the Author

- Michael Collins is a Washington DC area writer, researcher, and citizen journalist. Since 2005, Collins has tackled the subjects the corporate media ignores. His articles on the perversion of voting rights and elections culminated with a major study that showed the official story of the 2004 election had to be false. Collins series on The Money Party anticipated the thievery behind the financial collapse of 2008. He wrote extensively about the Susan Lindauer case, the U.S. intelligence operative that was indicted and locked in a psychiatric prison for months when she tried to tell Congress why the Iraq invasion was totally unnecessary. When no one in corporate media would talk to him, Collins did three major interviews with former Charles Manson prosecutor and leading crime author Vincent Bugliosi on his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. Recently, Collins wrote about the disastrous Libyan invasion and the massive injustices of the U.S. attack on Syria. Today, Collins is focused on the propaganda and massive deception by the Obama administration and its NATO partners regarding the coup in Ukraine and attack by the U.S. supported government against its own people. Collins is a featured contributor to OpEdNews, one of top 100 political web sites on the internet. His home page is http://opednews.com/michaelcollins

Displaying 120 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. @tomaatman says:

    Former BUK 312 crewmember revealed that the missile unit was in fact manned by the Ukraine military.
    http://t.co/k6YQhCrPng #MH17

  2. @keyblog says:

    RT @Baka_62: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/teCqkv03vW
    #MH17

  3. @viddleur says:

    RT @Baka_62: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/teCqkv03vW
    #MH17

  4. RT @Baka_62: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/teCqkv03vW
    #MH17

  5. @Qui_Gon_Gil says:

    RT @Novorossiyan: #Russiaisright

    Via @Baka_62

    Shooting Down MH 17 –BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/Sgj0sqdqqD … …

  6. @rog2010 says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/JIVbrdCdi3 via @@UkraineWarInfo

  7. #UkraineShotDownMH17

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member:

    http://t.co/biwAljRtHj

  8. @HatHooi says:

    RT @Novorossiyan: #UkraineShotDownMH17

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member:

    http://t.co/biwAljRtHj

  9. MH17: BUK 312 Story False – Ex Ukraine BUK 312 Crew Member Confirms http://t.co/5Od9T8rL0f

  10. @wavetossed says:

    RT @senorchompers: Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/N2N6rUJSTI @AbbyMartin @BreakingTheSet @…

  11. @Ing__ro says:

    RT @ianpetersellar: MH17: BUK 312 Story False – Ex Ukraine BUK 312 Crew Member Confirms http://t.co/5Od9T8rL0f

  12. @hdalmolen says:

    RT @quovadisweblog: Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/kgJRUlF4QC

  13. @merlijngfs says:

    RT @quovadisweblog: Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/kgJRUlF4QC

  14. @OrBVIOUS66 says:

    “Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member”
    http://t.co/afmLIv50he

  15. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/QtYfD4si3C #worldnews #news #breakingnews

  16. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/ia1rj0tYaH http://t.co/uB6j5snAaC

  17. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  18. @GeertGooris says:

    RT @quovadisweblog: Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/kgJRUlF4QC

  19. @NBTWT says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/4L5KNiRJad

  20. RT @bitcoinijojo: http://t.co/r6gCpzOxMK #MH17 #UKRAINE #NAZI #falseflag

  21. @Whtapl says:

    @ganyet http://t.co/qdNCxIC4Hw
    this michael collins?

  22. @GRAFIXEL says:

    “Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member” |Ukraine http://t.co/9FvwYfbfCF http://t.co/A5xqQ5U2hf @EliotHiggins

  23. @maryfloor says:

    Shooting #MH 17 – False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/SGxaVRIWBa | Ukraine http://t.co/SGxaVRIWBa http://t.co/dI9Vts0J5f

  24. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/kbFBGlr827 http://t.co/kW2oIVzQfd

  25. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  26. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  27. @PattyDs50 says:

    RT @Novorossiyan: @BBC Via @Sherinswan

    Downed #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/FER8LV6D8q |htt…

  28. RT @Novorossiyan: @BBC Via @Sherinswan

    Downed #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/FER8LV6D8q |htt…

  29. #BUK that “Downed“ #MH17 was Crewed by Ukrainian Army:
    @Greg_Palast @maxseddon @jonsnowC4
    http://t.co/GaX40SKQH0 http://t.co/WwCijUHC1L

  30. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member – http://t.co/TiDhFxUzB0 #novorossiya

  31. @contraviews says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/U1lfHhkeb3 via @@UkraineWarInfo Re: http://t.co/qbkt318PoP

  32. @ecpkoko says:

    Interesting story re MH17.Ping @Sawalaga http://t.co/hXCb85HiiX

  33. […] russischer Sprache des Interviews mit dem Soldaten, wurde am 17. Dezember von Michael Collins auf UkraineWar.Info veröffentlicht. Der Journalist war seit Juli sehr eng bei den vielen Untersuchungen dabei, die […]

  34. @000120o says:

    RT @CCKKI: Shooting down #MH17 – #BUK312 story #false says #Ukraine #crew member Anatoly #Sharij
    http://t.co/zdUC7hVCZz via @@UkraineWarInfo

  35. @CCKKI says:

    #MH17-#BUK312 story false says #Ukraine crew member
    @FedericaMog @matteorenzi @PaoloGentiloni have you read this yet?
    http://t.co/jXx52mGPhs

  36. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/N0IaaRxOpA via @@UkraineWarInfo

  37. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  38. @dead_rose2 says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/JtoRAvNKo0 http://t.co/JSvLEkyiO6

  39. @Segeltexter says:

    RT @gaijinrage: Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member
    http://t.co/GiggEBElEl

  40. @maryfloor says:

    Shooting Down #MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – http://t.co/dI9Vts0J5f

  41. @WMPost says:

    Shoot Down #MH17 – former BUK312 crewmember revealed that missile unit was in fact manned by #Ukraine military. – http://t.co/RXic9UgIqI

  42. […] mai interesant : Ukrainian Soldier Confirms: Ukraine’s Military Shot Down Malaysian MH17 Plane Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member Reply With […]

  43. […] Engels vertaald transcript van een interview op 15 december is op 17 december gepost op “UkraïneWar.info” door onderzoeksjournalist Michael Collins. Hij is zeer nauw betrokken geweest bij meerdere […]

  44. RT @msmolenaar: http://t.co/vtvPrR2a47
    @volkstribunaal #MH17

  45. RT @VictorZubarev: You will not see this story in our MSM:

    #MH17
    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 31
    2 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member

    http…

  46. JJ087 says:

    Shariy is a quite clever man. I recommend to watch his videos on the net for those who understand Russian. He kicks ass.

  47. @eurasianhub says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/7BXTCsqPQ9

  48. RT @NovorossiyaNA: #MH17 #BUK-312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/FSj3OTsZqg / #falseflag http://t.co/ioy2OW3xO0

  49. @SydWalker says:

    ‘Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member’ by Michael Collins
    http://t.co/1mD4LiGA0j

  50. @maryfloor says:

    RT @NovorossiyaNA: #MH17 #BUK-312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/FSj3OTsZqg / #falseflag http://t.co/ioy2OW3xO0

  51. RT @JackMarsman: Why the #BUK story about #MH17 is another #USA lie ; http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF So 99,9% impossible i…

  52. @glorie_miss says:

    RT @JackMarsman: Waarom het #BUK verhaal #MH17 gewoon de zoveelste #USA leugen is : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A en http://t.co/weENQwNyKF 99,9% …

  53. @l_ruigrok says:

    RT @JackMarsman: Why the #BUK story about #MH17 is another #USA lie ; http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF So 99,9% impossible i…

  54. @JackMarsman says:

    @Trommelbob Lees het zorgvuldig. http://t.co/weENQwNyKF Fragmenten te groot om te twitteren.

  55. @JackMarsman says:

    @DBabatzanis @mennohulshof @NOS En kan Westerbeke deze ook nog even meenemen http://t.co/weENQwNyKF Weten we zeker dat Oekraine dader was.

  56. @AWOLanalyst says:

    @roarbro @loonsdale Downed MH 17 False Flag Says Ukraine BUK Crew Member | Ukraine http://t.co/C5JEKD7mFV http://t.co/Y5gGaZR7bE

  57. @castrocalo says:

    #Ucrania Shooting Down #MH17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/CthaQl22Ej http://t.co/Se66QOCFS6

  58. […] Engels vertaald transcript van een interview op 15 december is op 17 december gepost op “UkraïneWar.info” door onderzoeksjournalist Michael Collins. Hij is zeer nauw betrokken geweest bij meerdere […]

  59. @tux1977 says:

    Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/VeXoXrHwx2 via @@UkraineWarInfo

  60. .@stacyherbert State propaganda Channel would say that.
    The #BUK that “Downed“ #MH17 was Crewed by Ukrainian Army:
    http://t.co/GaX40SKQH0

  61. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  62. @JackMarsman says:

    @botvierder @JoostNiemoller @CarolineVonhoff http://t.co/weENQwNyKF & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym Voor het geval BUK was,wat ik zeer betwijfel

  63. RT @WNews_Reddit: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/9Ddy8QEmH7

  64. @A3nTulp says:

    Shooting Down #MH17 – #BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/imvPqBzoYz

  65. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/L66u3pAfZl via @@UkraineWarInfo

  66. @jkmccrann says:

    @marcelvandenber looks like it was a Ukrainian BUK http://t.co/pOuLWzoVLf

  67. Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/dCyrqvWqDy http://t.co/tUmAiUyKBu

  68. @Tactilepoet says:

    RT @jack_frost2030: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member – Ukraine http://t.co/dCyrqvWqDy http://t.co/tUmAiUy…

  69. This shows what our governments will do to protect THEM and THEIR OWN PEOPLE:

  70. RT @natomission_ru: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/QyjHeSYoR0 http://t.co/QjmdrNLGIX

  71. @JamesWith says:

    #Shooting Down #MH17 – #BUK312 #Story #False says #Ukraine #Crew #Member http://t.co/bX4euYxf4N #War #US #Russia #WWIII

  72. RT @natomission_ru: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/QyjHeSYoR0 http://t.co/QjmdrNLGIX

  73. @PILIGRIM343 says:

    RT @natomission_ru: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/QyjHeSYoR0 http://t.co/QjmdrNLGIX

  74. @bambou2012 says:

    RT @JamesWith: #Shooting Down #MH17 – #BUK312 #Story #False says #Ukraine #Crew #Member http://t.co/bX4euYxf4N #War #US #Russia #WWIII

  75. @shag7575 says:

    RT @BradCabana: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/4tXsVlsyTa via @UkraineWarInfo #cdnpoli

  76. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  77. @psulc4fun says:

    RT @BradCabana: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/4tXsVlsyTa via @UkraineWarInfo #cdnpoli

  78. RT @BradCabana: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/4tXsVlsyTa via @UkraineWarInfo #cdnpoli

  79. @JamieK_UNB says:

    RT @BradCabana: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says #Ukraine Crew Member: http://t.co/4tXsVlsyTa via @UkraineWarInfo #cdnpoli

  80. @JackMarsman says:

    @NiemandsKnegt @JohannesDreijer #Ukr lanceer unit even sep. gebied in gereden ;http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF Past precies.

  81. @rene_baljon says:

    RT @JackMarsman: @WinMar5 @obk Dus idd een Ukr BUK : http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF Lanceerunit even sep.gebied ingereden.…

  82. @GRAFIXEL says:

    @AricToler @ArtWendeley @K_Kelly & he also says the rebels worked on getting them active http://t.co/A5xqQ5U2hf

  83. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  84. @Kadynin says:

    RT @natomission_ru: Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/QyjHeSYoR0 http://t.co/QjmdrNLGIX

  85. […] könnte der Absturzgrund sein. […] MH17-Abschuß: Zeuge sagt aus – Es war Hauptmann Woloschin Shooting Down MH 17 – BUK 312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member Geschrieben von Kay Macke in gerüchteküche um 12:45 | Kommentare (0) | Trackbacks (0) […]

  86. […] hatte ein Mitglied der Besatzung der BUK Nr. 312 der ukrainischen Armee ausgesagt, dass das Raketensystem damals wie heute der ukrainischen Armee gehörte. Ukraine und NATO hatten […]

  87. […] hatte ein Mitglied der Besatzung der BUK Nr. 312 der ukrainischen Armee ausgesagt, dass das Raketensystem damals wie heute der ukrainischen Armee gehörte. Ukraine und NATO hatten […]

  88. @JackMarsman says:

    @cmsNetherlands Picture from BUK, this is 312. Unit belong to #Ukr army. Read : http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF.

  89. […] hatte ein Mitglied der Besatzung der BUK Nr. 312 der ukrainischen Armeeausgesagt, dass das Raketensystem damals wie heute der ukrainischen Armee gehörte. Ukraine und NATO hatten […]

  90. […] hatte ein Mitglied der Besatzung der BUK Nr. 312 der ukrainischen Armee ausgesagt, dass das Raketensystem damals wie heute der ukrainischen Armee gehörte. Ukraine und NATO hatten […]

  91. […] hatte ein Mitglied der Besatzung der BUK Nr. 312 der ukrainischen Armee ausgesagt, dass das Raketensystem damals wie heute der ukrainischen Armee gehörte. Ukraine und NATO hatten […]

  92. RT @JackMarsman: @Afterpappie @mennohulshof @NOS @MH017 Ukr. ex BUK crew getuigt : http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http:/…

  93. @varyparis says:

    RT @NovorossiyaNA: #MH17 #BUK-312 Story False Says Ukraine Crew Member http://t.co/FSj3OTsZqg / #falseflag http://t.co/ioy2OW3xO0

  94. […] that the Ukrainian Government claims shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner on July 17th has testified publicly for the first time, saying that the missile-battery was operated by the Ukrainian military, not by the rebels as […]

  95. @DenniZ010 says:

    RT @JackMarsman: @links_huftertje @ADnl Lachuh met het AD : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF #MH17 …

  96. RT @JackMarsman: @links_huftertje @ADnl Lachuh met het AD : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF #MH17 …

  97. @BergsmaGert says:

    RT @JackMarsman: @links_huftertje @ADnl Lachuh met het AD : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF #MH17 …

  98. @FritzFriebl says:

    RT @JackMarsman: @links_huftertje @ADnl Lachuh met het AD : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF #MH17 …

  99. @Odin011 says:

    RT @JackMarsman: @links_huftertje @ADnl Lachuh met het AD : http://t.co/x6ewv5Uw1A & http://t.co/MaiCCV49ym & http://t.co/weENQwNyKF #MH17 …

  100. This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your rss feed and look ahead to in the hunt for extra of your wonderful post.
    Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks

  101. You should take part in a contest for one of the greatest websites on the web.

    I most certainly will highly recommend this blog!

  102. RT @JasmijndeKoon: @Novorossiyan @falluja05 @Brian0123456789 English transcript can be found here:
    http://t.co/iT383zMrBO

  103. RT @JasmijndeKoon: @Novorossiyan @falluja05 @Brian0123456789 English transcript can be found here:
    http://t.co/iT383zMrBO

  104. RT @autoday: @FelineNut
    No BUK ? http://t.co/JqmBHlc8AC
    Full video interview with soldiers http://t.co/plPC3SMSR0
    @Rene_MarshCNN @Porta…

  105. RT @smemAU: No BUK ? http://t.co/8ZQ4HBq8fq
    Full video interview w soldiers http://t.co/CFtVbe9xMk
    https://t.co/u7iKPzyNIp
    #730report #…

  106. @AUwtf says:

    RT @smemAU: No BUK ? http://t.co/8ZQ4HBq8fq
    Full video interview w soldiers http://t.co/CFtVbe9xMk
    https://t.co/u7iKPzyNIp
    #730report #…

  107. @bodhibrian says:

    @roarbro @masamikuramoto @KevinRothrock @MarkSleboda1 http://t.co/QUeok894PQ

  108. @nswfire says:

    RT @smemAU: No BUK ? http://t.co/8ZQ4HBq8fq
    Full video interview w soldiers http://t.co/CFtVbe9xMk
    https://t.co/u7iKPzyNIp
    #730report #…

  109. @Samstwitch says:

    DEC 2014: BUK 312 Crewmember says Ukraine Military shot down MH17 http://t.co/aQ4FKEGToJ via @Global_Britain http://t.co/DUCMPC3xQ6

  110. RT @Samstwitch: DEC 2014: BUK 312 Crewmember says Ukraine Military shot down MH17 http://t.co/aQ4FKEGToJ via @Global_Britain http://t.co/DU…